QuickOPC Compatibility Test List: Difference between revisions

From OPC Labs Knowledge Base
Line 195: Line 195:
|<span style='color:green'>Passed</span>
|<span style='color:green'>Passed</span>
|RID: win10-x64
|RID: win10-x64
|-
|'''Microsoft Windows 10 Pro'''
|1803 x64 (English)
|2019-03
|OPC Labs
|2019.1 (5.55)
|Interoperability workshop
|<span style='color:green'>Passed</span>
|


|-
|-

Revision as of 16:14, 8 March 2019

Older test lists: Application note: QuickOPC-UA Compatibility Test List

Introduction

The Compatibility Test List documents the test performed with the product with the aim to assure its compatibility widest range of systems it depends on or interoperates with. This document is updated from time to time, as new tests are being performed.

This document is grouped by the classes of systems that this product depends on or interoperates with, such as "Platform hardware" or "Operating systems". Each class has a standalone chapter.

The entries in each group are sorted by the columns from left to right, i.e. first by "Other system model", then by "Other system version", and then by "Test date.

Field descriptions

Other system model

"Other system" is the system we are testing the compatibility of this product with. It can be hardware, software, or a combination.

Other system version

This field contains additional details about the other system, typically its versioning information, if available.

Test date

Describes when the test was performed. It can be a specific date, date range, or approximate date such as a month in a year.

Performed by

This field determines the entity (person or organization) that has performed the test.

This product version

This field contains versioning information about this (our) product, typically including the software build and revision numbers, too.

If a test that was otherwise identical in other parameters has been performed with a newer version of this product, and the outcome was the same or better, the old entry in the compatibility test list may be removed for brevity. This is done so because the main purpose of the compatibility test list is to assess the compatibility of the latest available version of this product.

On the other hand, entries for tests performed with earlier versions of this product that were not repeated later are always retained. It can be assumed that later versions of this product continue to operate with at least the same outcome as the version that has been tested.

Test type

  • Alpha test.
  • Basic test.
  • Compliance test.
  • Developer test.
  • Field test.
  • Interoperability workshop.

Test outcome

  • Failed. There is always a Note describing the details.
  • Inconclusive. There is always a Note describing the details.
  • Passed.
  • Warning. There is always a Note describing the details.

Notes

This field contains any relevant notes, especially to the test environment, or outcome of the test.

Platform hardware

Other system model Other system version Test date Performed by This product version Test type Test outcome Notes
Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40 GHz 2.39 GHz; 4.00 GB 2018-06 OPC Labs 2018.2 (5.53) Basic test Passed W7SP1/x32
Intel Core i7-3930K CPU @ 3.20 GHz 3.80 GHz; 32.0 GB 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Passed W7SP1/x64
Intel Core i7-3930K CPU @ 3.20 GHz 3.80 GHz; 32.0 GB 2016-11 OPC Labs 5.41 Interoperability workshop Passed W7SP1/x64
Intel Core i7-3930K CPU @ 3.20 GHz 3.80 GHz; 32.0 GB 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Passed W7SP1/x64
Intel Core i7-7820X CPU @ 3.60 GHz 3.60 GHz; 32.0 GB 2018-06 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54) Developer test Passed W10/x64

More tests were performed, currently not explicitly listed here.

Operating systems

Other system model Other system version Test date Performed by This product version Test type Test outcome Notes


CentOS 7.5.1804 2018-07 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54) Basic test Passed RID: centos.7-x64
Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 x64 (English) 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Passed
Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 x32 (English) 2018-06 OPC Labs 2018.2 (5.53) Basic test Passed
Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 x64 (English) 2016-11 OPC Labs 5.41 Interoperability workshop Passed
Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 x64 (English) 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Passed
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 1803 x64 (English) 2018-06 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54) Developer test Passed RID: win10-x64
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 1803 x64 (English) 2019-03 OPC Labs 2019.1 (5.55) Interoperability workshop Passed
Oracle Linux 7.5 2018-07 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54) Basic test Passed RID: linux-x64
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 2018-06 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54) Basic test Passed RID: rhel.7-x64
Ubuntu 17.10 2018-06 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54) Basic test Passed RID: linux-x64
Ubuntu 18.04 2018-06 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54) Basic test Passed RID: ubuntu.18.04-x64

More tests were performed, currently not explicitly listed here.

.NET runtimes

Other system model Other system version Test date Performed by This product version Test type Test outcome Notes
.NET Core 2.0.6 2018-06 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54) Basic test Passed
.NET Core 2.0.7 2018-06 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54) Basic test Passed
.NET Core 2.1.2 2018-07 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54) Basic test Passed

More tests were performed, currently not explicitly listed here.

OPC servers

OPC UA Generic/Data

Other system model Other system version Test date Performed by This product version Test type Test outcome Notes
3S-Smart Software Solutions: CODESYS OPC UA Server 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Passed
3S-Smart Software Solutions: CODESYS OPC-UA Server V3.5.13.10 2018-10 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54.0.33) Interoperability workshop Passed
Baker Hughes/GE: iFIX 6.0 2018-10 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54.0.33) Interoperability workshop Passed
Beckhoff Automation: TF6100 OPC-UA 2.2.21 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Passed
Beckhoff Automation: TwinCAT TF6100 OPC UA (Client/Server) 3.x 2016-11 OPC Labs 5.41 Interoperability workshop Passed
Bosch Rexroth: IndraMotion MTX 14VRS 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Warning [1]
Certec EDV: atvise 3.3.0 2018-10 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54.0.33) Interoperability workshop Passed
dieEntwickler Elektronik: SITOP PSU8600 1.2.0-Dev 2016-11 OPC Labs 5.41 Interoperability workshop Failed [2]
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft: SecurePlugAndWorkUAServer 1.1.3 2016-11 OPC Labs 5.41 Interoperability workshop Passed
General Electric Corporation: CIMPLICITY OPC UA Server 9.5 Beta 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Passed [3]
General Electric Corporation: CIMPLICITY Server 9.5 SIM2 2016-11 OPC Labs 5.41 Interoperability workshop Warning [4]
Hilscher: OPC UA Server Micro 0.9.11.1 2016-11 OPC Labs 5.41 Interoperability workshop Warning [5]
Hilscher: OPC UA Server Nano 0.9.11.1 2016-11 OPC Labs 5.41 Interoperability workshop Warning [5]
HIMA Paul Hildebrandt: HIMA OPCUA Server 1.0 2018-10 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54.0.33) Interoperability workshop Passed [6]
HMS Industrial Networks: eWON Flexy FW 13.1PR 2018-10 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54.0.33) Interoperability workshop Passed
IBHsoftec: IBH Link UA 3.07 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Passed [7]
IBHsoftec: IBH OPC UA IOT2040 3.07 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Passed [7]
ICONICS: GENESIS64 10.96 2018-10 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54.0.33) Interoperability workshop Warning [8][9]
Inductive Automation: Eclipse Milo OPC-UA Server SDK 0.1.0-SNAPSHOT 2016-11 OPC Labs 5.41 Interoperability workshop Passed [10]
IPCOMM: ipConvLite 3.x 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Passed
IPCOMM: ipConvOPC 3.x 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Passed
Kepware Technologies: OPC UA Server - KEPServerEX 6.0 2016-11 OPC Labs 5.41 Interoperability workshop Passed
MatrikonOPC: FLEX OPC UA SDK - Nano Embedded Device Server Profile R410.2 2018-10 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54.0.33) Interoperability workshop Passed
Microsoft: .Net Standard Library OPC Server Nov-11-2016 2016-11 OPC Labs 5.41 Interoperability workshop Warning [11]
Microsoft: .Net Standard Reference Server (Ubuntu) Sep-18-2017 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Passed
Microsoft: .Net Standard GDS Server Sep-18-2017 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Passed
OMRON: NJ OPC UA Server 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Passed [7]
Phoenix Contact: PC WORX UA Server 1.03.961.3 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Warning [12]
Progea: Platform.NExT 3.3.200 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Passed
Progea: Connext 3.3.200 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Passed
Prosys OPC: OPC UA Java SDK 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Warning [13]
Prosys OPC: Sentrol - OPC UA SDK for Delphi 7.0 Beta 2018-10 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54.0.33) Interoperability workshop Failed [14]
SAP SE: Plant Connectivity on Linux (Raspbian) 15.1.5 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Passed [15]
SAP SE: Plant Connectivity on Windows 10 15.1.5 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Passed [15]
Siemens: miniweb OPC UA 5.3.2 beta 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Failed [16]
Siemens: SIMATIC NET OPC Server S7 opt V13 SP1 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Warning [17]
Siemens: SIMATIC RF600 V3.1 2018-10 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54.0.33) Interoperability workshop Passed
Siemens: SIMATIC S7-1518 V2.5 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Passed [18]
Siemens: Simatic WinCC V7.4 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Passed [19]
Siemens: Simatic WinCC V7.5 2018-10 OPC Labs 5.54 (2018.3.0.33) Interoperability workshop Passed [19]
Siemens: WinCC Runtime Professional V15.1 2018-10 OPC Labs 5.54 (2018.3.0.33) Interoperability workshop Passed
Softing Industrial Automation: dataFEED OPC Suite 4.43.0 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Warning [20]
Softing Industrial Automation: Falcon Server 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Warning [21][22]
Softing Industrial Automation: OPC UA C++ Server Development Toolkits for Windows 1.00 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Passed
Softing Industrial Automation: OPC UA Embedded Toolkit 5.53 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Passed
Softing Industrial Automation: OPC UA .NET Server Development Toolkits 1.43 2017-09 OPC Labs 2017.2 (5.51.0.7) Interoperability workshop Warning [23][9]
Systerel: S2OPC Demo Server 0.5.0* 2018-10 OPC Labs 5.54 (2018.3.0.33) Interoperability workshop Warning [24]
Takebishi: Device Gateway 2.1.2 2018-10 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54.0.33) Interoperability workshop Passed
Tani: OPC Server 1.7 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Passed
Tani: OPC Server Linux 1.7 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Passed [25]
Tani: PLC Engine Server raspberry 1.12 2016-11 OPC Labs 5.41 Interoperability workshop Failed [2]
Unified Automation: C based OPC UA Server SDK 1.5.1 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Warning [26]
Unified Automation: C++ based OPC UA Server SDK WINDOWS 1.5.0 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Warning [26]
Unified Automation: .NET based OPC UA Server SDK 2.4.0 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Warning [26][9]
University of West Bohemia in Pilsen: OPC UA server for REX Control System 1.0.0 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Passed
Yokogawa Electric Corporation: UA Server for CENTUM VP R1.02.10 2015-11 OPC Labs 5.36 Interoperability workshop Passed

OPC UA Global Discovery Services (GDS), Certificate Management (CM)

Other system model Other system version Test date Performed by This product version Test type Test outcome Notes
Microsoft: Azure IoT OPC Vault GDS Server private preview 2018-10 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54.0.33) Interoperability workshop Passed
OPC Foundation: UA .Net Standard Global Discovery Server 1.03.352.12 2018-09 OPC Labs 2018.3 (5.54.0.33) Developer Test Passed


More tests were performed, currently not explicitly listed here.

  1. ↑ do not know the HTTPS endpoint
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 getting BadIdentityTokenRejected from ActivateSession() with user identity = username/password
  3. ↑ the ServerDiagnostics.SessionDiagnosticsArray cannot be read with the credentials provided for testing
  4. ↑ server is revising publishing intervals to 0 and using its own
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 failed: reading and writing with IndexRange
  6. ↑ No dynamic nodes could have been tested.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 The SessionDiagnosticsArray node is missing, but the sessions are correctly available under SessionDiagnosticsSummary.
  8. ↑ Server sends data changes too fast.
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Absolute Deadband filter: server sometimes sends notifications where the difference is less than the deadband
  10. ↑ HTTPS not supported by the server?
  11. ↑ reading Server_ServerDiagnostics_SessionsDiagnosticsSummary_SessionDiagnosticsArray (nsu=http://opcfoundation.org/UA/;i=3707) gives BadOutOfService
  12. ↑ reading ServerDiagnostics.SessionDiagnosticsArray gives BadNodeIdUnknown
  13. ↑ All nodes (even scalars from standard information model etc.) have ValueRank equal to -2 (Any): not compliant.
  14. ↑ The server returns ValuRank 0 for scalar nodes.
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 Could not test much, server only has method calls support.
  16. ↑ 1) Effects of Writes with IndexRange are not sent through subscription. 2) Subscription ignores IndexRange. 3) After writing into an IndexRange, the whole array seems to be replaced when doing subsequent Read
  17. ↑ Server sends changes too fast. I used sampling interval 2000 ms. The server has not revised it. But it has been sending notifications with average rate between 800-900 ms. I think it would be OK to send values faster than requested, but in that case the server should report the faster revised sampling rate properly to the client.
  18. ↑ for S7-1500 family
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 no arrays available for testing
  20. ↑ sometimes getting just BadWaitingForInitialData and no further update
  21. ↑ Falcon appears to be a code name for upcoming version of dataFEED OPC Suite.
  22. ↑ Getting "Could not create SSL/TLS secure channel." with HTTPS endpoint; it is possible that the problem is on the client side.
  23. ↑ Writing with index range always gives BadIndexRangeInvalid
  24. ↑ There are nodes that have variable class, but return BadAttributeInvalid for the UserAccessLevel and Historizing attributes, which are mandatory.
  25. ↑ values not changing
  26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 26.2 looks like LDS is not running
Retrieved from "https://kb.opclabs.com/index.php?title=QuickOPC_Compatibility_Test_List&oldid=2026"